Image in modal.

In common micro-indention measurements (ASTM E368), a diamond probe of specific shape (Knoop or Vickers) is pressed into the sample specimen using a controlled force (9.8 x 10-3to 9.8N.) Once the pre-set test force is applied, the probe is typically held for 10 to 15 seconds and retracted. The dimensions of the resulting indent are then measured using an optical microscope. The Vickers or Knoop hardness of the material is calculated from the applied force and the dimensions of the indent that persists in the material after the probe is retracted. The Vickers hardness number (VH) is calculated from the force applied divided by the surface area of the permanent impression made by the indenter. The Knoop harness number is obtained by diving the applied force by the projected area of the permanent impression made by the indenter. 1

This powerful technique is an important characterization tool used in many industries to quantify surface hardness variations due to a wide range of processes such as flame hardening, shot hardening, carburization and nitriding. However, many types of materials are not amendable to analysis using ASTM E384. For example:

  • Elastic materials such as rubbers may “bounce back” when the indenter is withdrawn and not retain a permanent measurable impression of the indenter.
  • Characterization of very thin films may require force loads well below the standard to reduce the contributions of the substrate material.
  • Brittle materials such as ceramics or glasses may crack if the indention force is too large.
  • Measuring the indents may be difficult for optically transparent materials.

For these types of samples, dynamic micro-indentation measurements may be useful.

Figures 1 and 2 show a commercially available dynamic micro-indentation measurement device, and basic schematic. With dynamic micro-indentation measurements, a probe is pressed into the sample using an electromagnetically controlled force while the penetration depth is monitored in real time using a differential transformer. With this design the force range is 0.1 to 1.981 mN which is much lower than the force range of conventional micro-indention testers. The probe displacement range is 0 to 10 microns, and the minimum measurement increment is 0.0001 micron. The low-test forces and precise displacement measurement allow small samples and thin films to be analyzed accurately. A 115-degree pyramidal (Berkovich) indenter is commonly used but Vickers and Knoop probes are also available. The system design permits several loading test modes such as load-hold, load-unload, step loading and cyclic testing.

QM 0124 Test & Inspection Figure 1 feature image of Shmadzu DUH-211S Dynamic Ultra Micro Harness Tester
Figure 1: Shimadzu DUH 211S Dynamic Micro-indentation instrument
QM 0124Test & Inspection Figure 2: Schematic of micro-indentation device.
Figure 2: Schematic of micro-indentation device.
Test & Inspection Figure 3: Parameters used to calculate Martens Hardness (ISO 14577-1 Annex A)
Figure 3: Parameters used to calculate Martens Hardness (ISO 14577-1 Annex A)

The observed penetration is related to both the plastic and elastic deformation of the specimen. The relationship between test force and indentation depth can be used to evaluate several parameters such as Marten hardness, Indentation hardness, and Indentation modulus. ISO 14577-1 (Annex A) describes these calculations.Figure 3 shows the parameters used in the calculations. For example:

Martens Hardness HM115 = 1000 F/26.43 x h2 (N/mm2)

EXAMPLES

Example 1: Super Fine Wires3:

Fine tungsten (20-micron diameter) and stainless steel (30-micron diameter) wires were tested without the necessity of mounting in resin. The samples were simply taped to a silicon substrate as shown in figure 4. Figures 5 and 6 show the indentations on the tungsten and steel wires respectively. Figure 7 shows the force indentation depth curve for the two materials.

QM 0124 Test & Inspection Feature Figure 4: Wire sample preparation
Figure 4: Wire sample preparation
Test & Inspection Feature Figure 5: Indentation in Tungsten
Figure 5: Indentation in Tungsten
Test & Inspection Feature Figure 6: Indentation in Stainless steel
Figure 6: Indentation in Stainless steel
Test & Inspection Feature Figure Figure 7: Force-indentation depth for W and SUS wires
Figure 7: Force-indentation depth for W and SUS wires

Example 2: Thin Diamond-Like Carbon Coating (DLC)4

Thin DLC coatings are used to improve wear resistance and lubricity in a wide variety of industrial applications. This example shows a load/unload test of a 1-micron DLC coating. Note that the shallow penetration depth allows the thin DLC coating to be evaluated without influence from the substrate.

Test & Inspection Feature Figure 8: DLC Force indentation depth curves
Figure 8: DLC Force indentation depth curves

Example 3: Functional Films5

In this example three different 9-micron thick hard coatings were deposited on PET substrates and tested in accordance with ISO 1477-1. Figure 10 shows the force indentation depth curves for the three coating types.

Test & Inspection Feature Figure 9: Hard coat sample details
Figure 9: Hard coat sample details
Test & Inspection feature Figure 10: Force indentation depth curves for three hard coats
Figure 10: Force indentation depth curves for three hard coats

Plastic Testing: ISO/TS 19278-20196

The application of the micro-indentation technique to the analysis of plastics has been codified by International Organization for Standards in 2019: ISO/TS 19278-2019. Table 1 shows the primary test conditions defined in ISO/TS 19278-2019

Example 4: Thins Plastic Samples7

Thin rectangular blocks (20mm x 10mm x 3 mm) of four plastics: polypropylene, high density polyethylene, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene/polymethyl methacrylate and polystyrene were tested in accordance with ISO/TS 14277-2019.

Figure 11 shows the force indentation depth curves. Table 2 and figure 12 show the average values of the calculated indentation hardness.

Test & Inspection feature Figure 11: Force indentation depth curves for 4 plastics
Figure 11: Force indentation depth curves for 4 plastics
Test & Inspection feature Figure 12: Average Indentation Hardness Test results for 4 plastics (n=5)
Figure 12: Average Indentation Hardness Test results for 4 plastics (n=5)

Example 5: UV Weathering Of Plastics8

This example shows the hardening effects of UV exposure on two plastics: polypropylene and poly carbonate as measured in accordance with ISO 19278-2019. Figures 13 and 14 show the force indentation depth curves for PP and PC exposed to 0, 1 and 100 hours of exposure to UV. Figure 15 shows the increase in indentation hardness with UV irradiation time.

Test & Inspection feature Figure 13: Polypropylene Force indentation depth curves
Figure 13: Polypropylene Force indentation depth curves
Test & Inspection feature Figure 14: Polycarbonate force indentation depth curves
Figure 14: Polycarbonate force indentation depth curves
Test & Inspection feature Figure 15: Change of indentation hardness with UV irradiation time
Figure 15: Change of indentation hardness with UV irradiation time

Example 6: Effects Of Heat Treatment On Polylactic Acid Resin9

This example shows the hardening effect of annealing on a plant derived plastic, polylactic acid resin. Indention hardness measurements were taken in accordance with ISO 19278-2019 on PLA samples before and after a 30 minute anneal at 1000C. Figure 16 shows the force- indentation depth curves.

Test & Inspection Figure 16: Force-indentation curves
Figure 16: Force-indentation curves

Conclusion

These examples highlight the broad applicability of the dynamic hardness technique.

For additional details please consult the reference sources listed below.