The certification requirements to the international standard IATF 16949 are presented in the IATF Certification Specifications (“IATF Rules”). The sixth edition of the “Rules for Achieving and Maintaining IATF Recognition” was published on March 31, 2024. It has been stated that the changes have been made to improve certifiability, audit procedures and overall efficiency. The transition to the new Rules 6 must be completed by January 1, 2025, after which they will be mandatory for all audits. The most significant changes are performance and risk-based audit days instead of the current method, which is based on employee count. The following are changes that have a significant impact, but do not represent all the changes within Rules 6.
Requirement |
Rules 5th Edition |
Rules 5th Edition |
Eligibility and Certificate Structure |
|
Note: The term homologated means the whole vehicle approval process that results in a government issued certificate
|
Conflict of Interest |
|
The CB can't provide QMS related consulting service to the certified client. |
Certificate Structure |
Completed by January 1 |
Allowed to perform a registration audit at the next planned audit |
Audit Timing Surveillance Audits |
-3/+1 Month |
-3 /+3 months |
Audit Cycles |
6, 9 & 12 months
-3/+1 Month
|
|
Audit Planning |
|
|
Determination of audit days |
The total number of employees on site (including permanent, part time, contract, average number of daily workers for the previous six (6) month period, and temporary employees); and the number of relevant employees in supporting activities (remote or on site)
|
|
Audit Days Reduction |
|
|
Special Audits related to performance complaints |
|
The CB may appoint an auditor not part of the current audit cycle and the auditor is not considered part of the audit time for the current cycle. |
Standalone remote support locations |
|
Audit team is assigned and maintained for a 3-year period and shall be rotated after each 3-year period. |
Special Audit following certification withdrawal |
|
CB must assign an audit team ether from the previous audit cycle or from the upcoming audit cycle |
IATF Observers |
|
|
Systematic problem solving |
|
|
Stage 1 Readiness Assessment, Part 1 – System and Structure Review |
|
Requires the client’s relevant top management and management team member to demonstrate the quality management system and communicate other information as needed for the auditor to understand and confirm the items required in the mandatory fields in the IATF CARA Stage 1 assessment report.
|
Stage 1 Readiness Assessment, Part 2 – Operational Review |
|
Shall be based upon the “Gemba” principle to gain sufficient understanding of the QMS in operation on the shop floor, |
Stage 1 Readiness Assessment Closing Meeting |
|
|
Stage 1 Readiness Assessment Decision |
|
Assessment decision within a maximum of 15 days after closing meeting and in the IATF database. |
Stage 2 Certification Audit |
Time between closing meeting date of the Stage 1 and start date of Stage 2 shall be no more than 90 days. |
Time between closing meeting date of the Stage 1 and start date of Stage 2 shall be minimum of 20 days but no more than 90 days. |
Decision on suspension |
|
If suspension is due to performance complaint, the client shall provide response in IATF CMS, within 20 days after receiving suspension notification. |